Difference between revisions of "Talk:Creation"

From Future Of Mankind
(Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension)
(Comment provided by Prakorimas - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
--[[User:Alive|-- M --]] 22:45, 27 May 2012 (BST)
 
--[[User:Alive|-- M --]] 22:45, 27 May 2012 (BST)
 +
</div>
 +
== Prakorimas said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
Maybe I didn't notice or missed something but I don't get it - what's energy?
 +
I know that it's an oscillation of sorts but of what? Oscillate only particles and motion like such can't exist on it's own...
 +
So, Creation is just a smallest and most active particle of all?
 +
 +
Anyone's help clearing that out or pointing to right page or article would be greatly appreciated as I'm lost here!
 +
 +
--[[User:Prakorimas|Prakorimas]] ([[User talk:Prakorimas|talk]]),  17:57, 7 July 2013 (CEST)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 15:57, 7 July 2013

Comments on Creation <comments />


Alive said ...

Saying that Creation is Creation is as fascinating as saying Batman is Batman.

---- M -- 17:30, 27 May 2012 (BST)

Jamesm said ...

I see your point but "Creation is Creation" was not mentioned in the article. "Creation is The Creation" means something useful, it implies that there is a uniqueness about it. Every Creation is unique? I've read that there are many Creations and the first one that created itself is the Absolute Absolutum. How it created itself such a long time ago, using the finest energy from the Absolute Nothing is something I cannot understand and probably won't for a few billion years.

--Jamesm 22:25, 27 May 2012 (BST)

Alive said ...

I must admit that you are right, JamesM. I should revise my point: Batman is the Batman.

---- M -- 22:45, 27 May 2012 (BST)

Prakorimas said ...

Maybe I didn't notice or missed something but I don't get it - what's energy? I know that it's an oscillation of sorts but of what? Oscillate only particles and motion like such can't exist on it's own... So, Creation is just a smallest and most active particle of all?

Anyone's help clearing that out or pointing to right page or article would be greatly appreciated as I'm lost here!

--Prakorimas (talk), 17:57, 7 July 2013 (CEST)