Talk:Contact Report 132: Difference between revisions
From Future Of Mankind
Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension |
Comment provided by Alive - via ArticleComments extension |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 00:13, 1 August 2012 (BST) | --[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 00:13, 1 August 2012 (BST) | ||
</div> | |||
== Alive said ... == | |||
<div class='commentBlock'> | |||
It has been 32 years after Semiase admitted that the Pleiarens "make wrong analyses in reference | |||
to the evaluation of the human being of Earth or his concerns" (Contact Report 130), and that they should "analyze the terrestrial humankind again in a new form" (Contact Report 132). In the course of time the Pleiarens had been improving their analitical methods and devices, which enable them to study Earth human life forms's behaviours in sharper images. It is safe to say that the Pleiarens today are not as naive as they were, and that their current assessments have become more accurate than they made in that difficult year of 1980. | |||
--[[User:Alive|-- M --]] 10:15, 1 August 2012 (BST) | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 09:15, 1 August 2012
Comments on Contact Report 132 <comments />
Jamesm said ...
Alive said ...
It has been 32 years after Semiase admitted that the Pleiarens "make wrong analyses in reference to the evaluation of the human being of Earth or his concerns" (Contact Report 130), and that they should "analyze the terrestrial humankind again in a new form" (Contact Report 132). In the course of time the Pleiarens had been improving their analitical methods and devices, which enable them to study Earth human life forms's behaviours in sharper images. It is safe to say that the Pleiarens today are not as naive as they were, and that their current assessments have become more accurate than they made in that difficult year of 1980.
---- M -- 10:15, 1 August 2012 (BST)
Thanks for the new translation Ben.
--Jamesm 00:13, 1 August 2012 (BST)