Talk:The Great Pyramid: Difference between revisions
Comment provided by Tk - via ArticleComments extension |
Comment provided by Jamesm - via ArticleComments extension |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
--[[User:Tk|Tk]] 08:50, 8 October 2010 (BST) | --[[User:Tk|Tk]] 08:50, 8 October 2010 (BST) | ||
</div> | |||
== Jamesm said ... == | |||
<div class='commentBlock'> | |||
Tk, everything changes through time. Agree? Did it not occur to you that the interior, exterior or both could have changed considerably over the long 73,000 years the great pyramid is said to have existed? | |||
The great big stones that the pyramids consists of would be difficult to move or replace one would naturally think however there could exist or have existed large caverns beneath the pyramids that would serve as larger storage or living areas with the pyramids themselves serving as observation points. | |||
When considering the age of the structure to be 73,000 years ago, this is possible. Do we have an accurate method of measuring the age of stone yet? Carbon dating perhaps? What stone or stones should be used for the measurement? A central block perhaps, deep inside the pyramid? Has this been done yet? | |||
The reason why it was built may be different. I might verify it and post it again. | |||
Many questions lie unanswered so neither you nor anyone should come to conclusions so easily and hastily, don't you agree? | |||
--[[User:Jamesm|Jamesm]] 19:58, 8 October 2010 (BST) | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 18:58, 8 October 2010
Comments on The Great Pyramid <comments />
Tk said ...
Jamesm said ...
Tk, everything changes through time. Agree? Did it not occur to you that the interior, exterior or both could have changed considerably over the long 73,000 years the great pyramid is said to have existed?
The great big stones that the pyramids consists of would be difficult to move or replace one would naturally think however there could exist or have existed large caverns beneath the pyramids that would serve as larger storage or living areas with the pyramids themselves serving as observation points.
When considering the age of the structure to be 73,000 years ago, this is possible. Do we have an accurate method of measuring the age of stone yet? Carbon dating perhaps? What stone or stones should be used for the measurement? A central block perhaps, deep inside the pyramid? Has this been done yet?
The reason why it was built may be different. I might verify it and post it again.
Many questions lie unanswered so neither you nor anyone should come to conclusions so easily and hastily, don't you agree?
--Jamesm 19:58, 8 October 2010 (BST)
The answer given that is said to come from Billy is hard to belieave.The answer states that the Pyramids were built for protection and a shelter. Any person that has visited Egypt like i have or know of there history will know that that answer is Ridiculous !! I have been in the Pyrimids and its almost entirely stone and only have small passages that leads to the burial chamber which can only hold about 60 people plus the Hieroglyphics in the Pyrimids tell you that it was built as a tomb for the Pharaohs so its No way possible it could have been built as a shelter. Its obvious that someone other than Billy gave that answer and whom every posted that answer should never post again because mistakes like that makes people believe that all of the information on the website is untrue. Please explain this answer with proof it was answered by Billy. My email address is uniqueinvestmenttk@gmail.com. Also the part where the person who asked the question says the Pyrimids were built 73,000 years ago is also very untrue. Please explain !
--Tk 08:50, 8 October 2010 (BST)