Talk:Event Timeline: Difference between revisions

From Future Of Mankind
Lepuniv (talk | contribs)
Comment provided by Lepuniv - via ArticleComments extension
Lepuniv (talk | contribs)
Comment provided by Lepuniv - via ArticleComments extension
Line 59: Line 59:


--[[User:Lepuniv|Lepuniv]] 09:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
--[[User:Lepuniv|Lepuniv]] 09:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
</div>
== Lepuniv said ... ==
<div class='commentBlock'>
Why is Prophet Billy's birth not mentionned?
Lepuniv
--[[User:Lepuniv|Lepuniv]] 09:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
</div>
</div>

Revision as of 09:22, 4 January 2011

Hawaiian 07:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)Excellent chronological presentation! Earth is indeed the center piece of the DERN universe (and DAL) in regards to the various positive/negative forces that date back to the split up of Nokodemion peoples via the creator overlords. The Bafath are truly evil, did they reincarnate into any Earth humans currently living? Also, is Andromedan High Council of the Hyperborea people (22 BC) the same as those that currently advise the Plejarens? Very interesting if so, now because of the neural-physical-particle "connections" (FIGU Special bulletin 38) that has "manifested" itself here on Earth, all parties whether negative or positive are in various ways, "connected" to current humans now living or more so "existing" on Earth.

These humans represent a magnitude of various fashions throughout this universe, a sort of "composite" circumstance "reality", the "key" to harmony and balance between all parties involved if the right parameters are introduced to bring this about. All parties have an interest(s) in the outcome of Earth humans, whether benevolent or evil, because their spiritual development depends on this "missing" key.

Semjasa created the Adam lineage

According to http://forum.figu.org/us/messages/12/3451.html?1062165882 this began 13500 years ago, not 387,000 BC

sc said ...

wtf

--sc 08:15, 10 June 2010 (BST)

Mark said ...

Many people have resided on Earth many times according to that timeline. I have always wondered if they would come back and visit. Of all the planets why did they have to try and conquer ours, those damn old Giza's. I guess going after the less developed beings was there plan. We sure do fall for those illusions rather easily. If we used our common sense and didn't get controlled by the fireworks we would probably be a bit better off right now. I hope if we are tested in the future we have matured enough so we don't fall for every trick in the book. The universe is so vast according to the distances and multiple time configurations, I'm sure that many that have left our planet are still out there somewhere. I just hope they grow up and have better intentions next time they plan to come back home.

--Mark 13:19, 10 June 2010 (BST)

Hawaiian 23:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Mark, I assume Earth, Malona and Mars were selected by these advanced ET's because of its far off location away from the ongoing Lyrian, Orion wars and that they knew others won't consider colonizing a SOL system with a dying central sun. However the insane god and religion concept was already established millions of years ago when the benevolent turned malevolent counter-parts of the Creator Overlords fled with the DNA manipulated humans to these planets and were later expelled. Thus, the concept of using religion to conquer, enslave and exploit others was well known when the evil Giza ancestors established themselves after conspiring the destruction of Atlantis and Mu, who were the biggest hinderance for their evil conquest.

However, because there are various types of reincarnations spanning this whole episode of events to include many ET's who perished, the links to them on Earth as well as other parts of the universe are still interconnected. Because of the Cause and Effect criteria, they are still obligated to resolve any issues that may fall under their responisbility that are still here on Earth.

An excellent analogy can be realized when one has the power to directly intervene in order prevent a crime such as murder, but instead chose not to and leaves for another planet, leaving the family to feud for themselves. After a few hundred years that same person (ET), comes back to find the family broken up and in despair, then gives them a set of directives to better their situation. Would it have been better if that ET had done the right thing in the first place rather than wait because it was more convienent to do so? Regardless, that ET or his/her material as well as spiritual Being are still connected from day one of that episode and continues, whether those connections remains positive or negative depends which side of the "equation" contribute or not contribute to balance the Equational Potentials that will determine which equational side evolves or stagnates.

Mark said ...

Hawaiian

The majority of people that have resided on Earth have one thing in common, they all wanted full control of everything. I don't know why many left but if everyone was that way I would want to change course especially if they are as cruel as they have been portrayed. Could ET's have prevented the World Wars with there tech they could. This is our world now and we can't rely on a past resident to pay the rent. I'm sure they do little things from time to time. Those ET's you speak of have faced the same challenges as we and prevailed, an example the Plejarens and there 50,000+ years of peace. It is now up to us to create and shape our outcome. Let's say that you had a father that caused tremendous pain and heartache as a leader, would you feel responsible and shoulder all the blame or choose to disagree and move on and choose your own path.

--Mark 05:12, 11 June 2010 (BST)

Adranchoi said ...

190,000 BC Pelegon arrives from Plejares, with 70,000 of his people, on Earth.[6]

VERSUS

http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Pelegon Pelegon An Jschwjsch who, 50,000 years ago, led the exodus of 70,000 human beings from a war-torn Plejares star system to the Sol star system.

Which is the correct date 190,000BC or 50,000 years ago?

--Adranchoi 08:26, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Lepuniv said ...

What about Prophet Billy's birth? Why isn't mentionned?

Lepuniv

--Lepuniv 09:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Lepuniv said ...

Why is Prophet Billy's birth not mentionned?

Lepuniv

--Lepuniv 09:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)