The Deepening
Complexity of Crop Circles
– Scientific Research and Urban Legends,
by Dutch Professor of experimental and theoretical physics, Eltjo H Haselhoff
offers the only all-embracing, yet witty and readable, scientific overview of
this masterfully talented and considerate extraterrestrial contact initiative.
While conservatively steering clear of that now unmistakable deduction as to
their real origin, this superbly illustrated 157 page book, first published in
2001, provides solid scientific substantiation of the unearthly geometrical and
physical intricacy of these increasingly fabulous forms in fields.
Click here to learn
more about our planet's current extraterrestrial
presence.
Now that the Old Age is finally dieing away, some enlightened commercial and
educational organizations, like Collins, have wisely chosen to identify
themselves with our extraterrestrial friends instead of
our recently deported extraterrestrial enemies.
It's a VERY GOOD SIGN of the times! And it's a very good book
too!
A strange
personal connection
State
of the art Field Forms,1999 season.
The above
thumbnails are hypertexed to bigger images.
(Sierpinski
curve)
These forms
within fields are becoming far more numerous and more bewilderingly
complex each year.
There is a fairly
universal belief throughout various cultures that only "the Creator"
can achieve perfection, and the works of mortals must reflect this
with deliberate "errors".
The bottom blue
arrow ( superimposed in the above click-for-closeup photos) shows one circle missing. It turns up at the
position of the top arrow. It's interesting to see that many of the
patterns surrounding some of the most remarkably mathematically
precise and complicated forms are actually quite irregular looking;
almost "freehand".
Each stalk of
wheat, or other crop, is individually softened and bent without
killing the plant, or in any other way harming it, except for a local
disturbance of the chromosomal material at a microscopic level. This
is produced by a process unknown to terrestrial technology, which
leaves a small dose of short half-life radioactivity behind.
Even
rural England is pretty crowded compared to
here, and there have been many, many eyewitnesses over the years. A
formation takes about fifteen seconds to simply "appear". The
artistic works are sometimes produced in several places at once in
the three or four hours of total darkness that constitute an English
midsummer night, often after heavy rains which produce soft deep mud
which the human investigators on the ground find very messy. The
artists never leave footprints. All this material was found on the
WWW, mostly (with thanks) from the U.K.'s Crop Circle Connector web
site, (unfortunately tainted by pseudoscience, which helps -
in part - to explain the aversion of reputable scientific
investigators).
|
Our 2002
Encyclopaedia Britannica has ABSOLUTELY NO MENTION of "crop
circles", even as a social phenomenon!
There's
not any news on the Kennedy assasinations, either.
WHY?
|
It's time for a
neologism, guys! Many years ago when these patterns were simple
circles in the crops, it made sense to call them "crop circles". The
name has stuck, as names do. They are found in other parts of the
world as well. The German ones are called "kornkreise" [literally:
'grain circles']. Calling the recent ones, shown above, "CROP
CIRCLES" makes even less sense than calling this year's Porsche a
"horseless carriage".
I propose 'field
forms'.
These artists are
also apparently consummate mathematicians, with a profound knowledge
of Euclidian geometry!
Everybody knows there's no such thing as
extraterrestrial technology!
OH YEAH? Click here to get your
socks knocked off!
Who (or
what) is making them?????????
And what
will the future bring, at the rate they are evolving?????????
I'd like to share another idea about what it is these guys might be
trying to tell us, but (let's be blunt) we're too stupid. It relates,
naturally enough, to language, another eclectic interest of mine. Perhaps those of
you who have the time to look right through the Sheldrake material will have got my
drift already.
I believe that we
may be falling victim to the common human trait of being unable to
see the forest because of the trees. Let's please stop trying to
figure out how they're MADE. I think that makes about as much sense
as a cocker spaniel trying to figure out how a radio works. And
cocker spaniels are very bright dogs.
I think that the
great variety of forms suggests that it is the forms themselves which should be taken as a whole - not separately - (get
it? HOLISM.) as simply forms within fields. This may simply be the universal
pedagogic tendencies of a more advanced culture
trying (within their own non-interventionist social restrictions) to
bring us up to speed a bit about the nature of nature; about how the
universe works. (See Sheldrake)
Two thoughts occur to
me here. First, why hasn't anybody else thought of this before? I
imagine they have, but they might have a job to worry about other
than planting trees, which is what Vivienne and I normally do.
And, if I'm right, and I've just "passed the test", then what?
........................
.........................
"They" are wonderfully attentive to detail. The little
wildflowers (above, left) are undisturbed. Many of the stalks seem to
have been bent individually into small bundles, and interwoven patterns and
braids. "Combing" occurs at the edges of a form when the grain bends
into the upright blades next to it in such a way that they are
perfectly enmeshed without the standing crop being pushed over. These
techniques invariably attract jargon like "combing" because they are
not previously encountered on this planet. Weird.
And here's just a little food for
thought:
For a
long time we've known that just bending these plants at
their growth nodes has not killed them, but recently reports
are filtering out about the progeny of the viable seeds
which were on those stalks. As you might imagine, due to the
abovementioned chromosomal abnormalities, some of these
seeds did not grow well, if at all. But here's where it gets
interesting. Some of these seeds were three to four time
as productive as normal ones. This means MONEY is going
to enter the equation in a BIG way. Imagine how keenly
sought a seed stock would be if it was FOUR TIMES as
productive as anything you'd been able to buy and plant
before! But since there might be just a LITTLE public
apprehension about EATING the stuff, it would inevitably
enter the supermarkets not unlike the mad cows of the early
1990's. Bit of a problem for the U.K. Department of
Agriculture, no? Imagine trying to keep something off the
shelves which has been genetically modified by little green
women from the planet Zarb!
|
................
(Self portraits?)
At first glance,
that might be an ant, but insects
have three
body segments: a head, a thorax and an abdomen.
The scorpion-like
creature,left, has a stinger visible in this close-up.
February 2004
What's been said in extraterrestrial Circles This
article by gaiaguys' Vivienne Legg links messages for Earth Humanity relayed through Crop Circles, the
U.S. - based Disclosure Project and through the Swiss contactee Billy Meier.
gaiaguys thanks the below
websites for their unwittingly generous provision of the images
The above U.K.
website is the definitive source of the latest photos.
While you're
there, visit Peter Sorensen's excellent website!
|
More Field Forms
from 1998
Back to
Homepage
