Difference between revisions of "Talk:Contact Report 443"

(Comment provided by Hawaiian - via ArticleComments extension)
(Comment provided by Cat - via ArticleComments extension)
Line 48: Line 48:
  
 
--[[User:Barbarian216|Hawaiian]] 03:44, 15 July 2012 (BST)
 
--[[User:Barbarian216|Hawaiian]] 03:44, 15 July 2012 (BST)
 +
</div>
 +
== Cat said ... ==
 +
 +
<div class='commentBlock'>
 +
Jay - I first watched the Jonathan Reed videos years ago and they were impressive. I still don't know where I stand on this, in fact I'm sitting.  On the fence.  I do question how someone would or could go to this much effort to create a humanoid being that was indeed so lifelike, I think at one stage, it's eyes were moving.  There's really no reason why it couldn't be true, we don't have a contact report translated that states anything to the contrary and Jonathan Reed has never been named by the Plejaran as one of the 'fakes'.  (That I know of.)  It's certainly an interesting few videos and others have put their reputations on the line to back him up so I'm willing to keep an open mind.  ps...I wouldn't call that particular being a 'reptilian', it's simply android/humanoid type (no genitalia etc)
 +
 +
--[[User:Cat|Cat]] 08:19, 15 July 2012 (BST)
 
</div>
 
</div>

Revision as of 07:19, 15 July 2012

Comments on Contact Report 443 <comments />


Reginald said ...

The comments of Ptaah are a bit harsh are they not? History was my favourite subject at school. And I have been reading Eich von Däniken and Zacharia Sitchin. The first Von Däniken's are interesting mindblowing conceptions. At least they made people aware and think, that history might have been differently from what we have learned at school. So the more i browse the contactreports the more i get the impression Ptaah has turned into an older and frustrated man. Sorry to say. Nothing a nice vacation in holland could not cure.

--Reginald 14:56, 2 May 2010 (BST)

Lorita said ...

I find that a fair amount of the comments regarding humans/potentials, etc rather harsh but we were warned we might not like all we read/hear. This isn't a fairy tale.

--Lorita 05:27, 22 May 2010 (BST)

Mark said ...

I presume they are referring to the V series on TV. :) I would rather be taken over by large dinosaurs, rather than disguised reptiles who pose as humans. j/k It's all about the money with these storytellers. One thing our dear planet Earth has is storytellers. If you want to hear the most untrue stories in the universe. Come one, come all beings of Dern or any other universe. I wouldn't be surprised if other beings from space trying to take over Earth, overall I would give our defense a rating of clumsical. We are improving though.

--Mark 20:19, 22 May 2010 (BST)

Jay1010101 said ...

Reptilian do exist, the Annunaki story may be true, check out htis video proof of Johnathan Reed on youtube at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKCq1ISd7zY&feature=related

--Jay1010101 02:56, 14 July 2012 (BST)

Zameen said ...

jay: nope

--Zameen 05:27, 14 July 2012 (BST)

Hawaiian said ...

Yeah Sheila, you're right about Zameen. His four letter word response says it all in a most efficient manner directly to the point that is quite emotional stimulating at the same time! All these books on fantasy based on fear really sells because only the ignorant which unfortunately comprises of the vast majority on this planet are influenced by it and buys into its agenda.

Ptaah agrees and is learning some new words from BEAM like "hacks", I just wonder what is the symbolic representation used in the 7th sense spiritual telepathy for such words in particular?

--Hawaiian 03:44, 15 July 2012 (BST)

Cat said ...

Jay - I first watched the Jonathan Reed videos years ago and they were impressive. I still don't know where I stand on this, in fact I'm sitting. On the fence. I do question how someone would or could go to this much effort to create a humanoid being that was indeed so lifelike, I think at one stage, it's eyes were moving. There's really no reason why it couldn't be true, we don't have a contact report translated that states anything to the contrary and Jonathan Reed has never been named by the Plejaran as one of the 'fakes'. (That I know of.) It's certainly an interesting few videos and others have put their reputations on the line to back him up so I'm willing to keep an open mind. ps...I wouldn't call that particular being a 'reptilian', it's simply android/humanoid type (no genitalia etc)

--Cat 08:19, 15 July 2012 (BST)