Comments on Contact Report 116
It seems many unqualified were assembled for this mission. I hope they weren't drawn from a hat.:) It seems that many seem to think of Earth as an afterthought when planning for all possible scenarios or underestimated the task. HMMMMMMMMMMMMM
--Markvd 02:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Very sad ending...
--Cat 00:03, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Don't feel bad Cat because it's only CR 116 they unite once again later to form the universal all stars.:) There sure is a lot of emotional moments which is good because if they lacked that I would fear they were robots.
--Markvd 00:17, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
What a bad ending. I have just awakened and don't understand all of this yet.
Why release that in english only today when it happened in 1978?
Love and Light to you all.
--Bridak 17:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
wow... this is by far the most dramatic exchange i have ever read in the contact reports... i can't wait to read 117 and 118 to see how it got turned around
--RemR 18:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Bridak, I would say it was only just released because only now was someone inclined to translate it into English (thanks go to the translator Ben Stevens for that).
This ending might be some kind of "reverse psychology" by Billy and the Plejaren to "sort out" the heads of the FIGU core group back then. Or..it might be simply how it reads...the Plejaren put too much pressure on Billy and he lost emotional control or let go of it perhaps, but only temporarily. Perhaps!
--Jamesm 00:22, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
See Contact Report 137, lines 35-50, when Quetzal programmed two androids, one representing Billy and the other, the inner core group members. The Plejarens ran an experiment to see what would happen when these two interacted. The one that represented Billy short circuited and burned up trying to reason with the inner core degenerates.
And the other did irrational things and blew up the space ship on the planet Pluto, Thus the Plejarens admitted they were not reasonable and over bearing to Billy.
There are more interesting conversations between Billy and the Plejarens, which resulted in their reassessment in continuing the mission. Bear in mind that they had more than 48,000 years of peace to evolve into the state they are currently at, without interferences or power lustful leaders imposing themselves on others, religious degenerative dogmas or shorten life spans in a relatively safe time-shifted dimension environment which they currently reside on.
Creational laws and directives works fine in these conditions, however because the Plejarens lack the necessary EXPERIENCE in such matters currently engrossed in Earthly matters such as those listed above and more negative influences, their mindset of applying such Creational methods to Earth humans may need to be adjusted to conditions here on this planet. As more interaction between Billy and the Plejarens, they become more reasonable and allow exceptions to Creational Laws and directives by BEAM simply for the fact that the Earthly environment does not follow “normal” conventions. See Contact Report 115: Found at the bottom section not the top (Semjase)
35. Everything in it is described, presented, and explained very much better than what would have been possible for me to do.
36. However, you should modify certain things a little, in the sense that you interweave some values, which have been worked out for you all by the High Council for a long time in accordance with earthly values.
37. The giving of laws and commandments - you should absolutely work these into your work, which then requires, however - as said - some changes in reference to transpositions.
38. If it is opportune for you, then I can transmit these laws and commandments to you tomorrow, so that you don't come into default with your work relating to this.
Jamesm, yes you’re right about the “reverse psychology” approach by Billy, even the High Council says the same when asked by the Plejarens
--Hawaiian 08:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Hawaiian, sorry for having to break this in on you, but you have a false understanding of this and are trying to justify your own uncrational behavior using the false interpretation.
What's even worse is that there are people out there who will listen to you and you will be responsible for spreading false teachings, throwing people off from the truth and lead them astray, and exactly that is what I'm trying to prevent.
--Sanjin 13:50, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Your opinions are shallow and without merit if you cannot or will not support it with hard evidence. What part of my post do you disagree on and back it up with facts or references?
I reference my posts and "connect" it appropriately unless of course you are "confused" as it reflects on your support of homosexuality which accordingly to Billy is "confusion".
--Hawaiian 20:13, 20 January 2011 (UTC)