Talk:Broken/Understanding The Term \x93Creation\x94

Revision as of 20:33, 13 December 2010 by Barbarian216 (talk | contribs) (Comment provided by Hawaiian - via ArticleComments extension)

Comments on Understanding The Term “Creation” <comments />

Alive said ...

"5. The human being should try quite simply to bring certain characterising words, which are applicable in regard to the nature of Creation -like, “everpresent", "almighty" and "all-knowing" -into association with the word or the designation “Creation”."

I choose the word "kindness" to be associated with "Creation". I do not care how it would affect me or other people who read this. I do this just to start the discussion.

---- M -- 15:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Hawaiian said ...


"Kindness" associated with Creation is valid ONLY if the Creational environment being "administered" adheres strictly to its principles and laws. However you should know that's not the case and saying "I do not care how it affects me or other people who read this" is very insulting to your other personalities and spirit as well as others who have been victimized!

So if you want to start a discussion on your approach, than support it, not troll for answers or responses from others to make that decision for yourself.

--Hawaiian 19:28, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Markvd said ...

I agree Alive kindness is a good starting point for development of character and BEING. Don't take Hawaiian too seriously, just listen because The Barbarian is untamable in terms of kindness at this point in time.:)

--Markvd 20:39, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Alive said ...


Kindness is not subject to anything. It makes its own principles and it own laws. It has its own reason and is moved by its own dynamic. It is not based on consent and does not wait for an agreement. It came from nowhere and could be found everywhere. Just like Creation.

Very insulting to my other personalities? If you know about them, please inform me via this discussion board, so I and "victimized" people could discuss it in an "administered", civilized, non-barbaric, environment.

---- M -- 03:31, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Alive said ...

Two Marks,

Maybe you are right. I should not take his words too seriously. I was provoked by his nickname, which reminds me of hula dancing girls I saw on some Youtube videos.

---- M -- 03:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Debbie 38 said ...

when i read the spiritual teachings i feel like a flower whose petals are opening up to the light and warmth of the sun...and when i am not taking the time to read the teachings I slowly feel like my petals are slowly starting to close up again to the darkness. Live in peace and love. Praise be creation. Salome  :)

--Debbie 38 18:40, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Hawaiian said ...

Only goes to show how ignorant Alive is, depending on U-Tube "assessments" of Hula dancing girls, another perverted white-washed description of so-called Hawaiian culture being projected by the mostly corrupt perverted white man's ideas on native people's culture, which they don't understand in the first place.

There are different types of hula, one for women that represents a story of various sorts that have hidden meanings as well that only those versed strongly in the culture can understand, not the mainly sexual nature which most "understand" being portrayed in today’s media. Yes, women has always been some type of sexual exploitation, but in Hawaiian culture they were held in highest esteem, being the source that determine the ranks of royalty in pass time.

The hula for men is mostly about warrior type messages and others less aggressive that also depicts a certain analogy of sorts, like a riddle, a message to ponder on. Hawaiian names are a serious matter, as in the Plejaren culture as well, not something one gives just because it sounds “right”.

The handles I choose are there for several reasons and certainly NOT what you may initially perceive as, but has hidden meanings for those that endeavor to look beyond the premises of these material presentations. Barbarian216 is vaguely described in certain portions of BEAM’s material that has negative connotations, but underlying such criteria is the possibility or “option” for such matters to evolve itself, creationally speaking for those that wish to make amends for current and pass deeds.

FIGU Special Bulletin 38 has enormous bearing in conjunction with the Spiritual Teachings and other related articles including Fluidal Energies and the reasons why the “shorten life cycles” are mentioned is for the benefit of both the victims of pass/current and those responsible for it.

It is there for the benefit of others as do the postings which have reasons behind it too, although it appears there are some on this forum who think otherwise either because they don’t have the necessary experiences, knowledge, lack the discipline of one’s ego or self or other mindset problems to realize that in order to look at the bottom of a pond, one must first calm the surface waves (mindset condition).

I will go and analyze more completely the Spiritual posting that Markvd has erroneously implied false accusations that I desire some outrageous assumptions of wanted some “extended” life cycle and other delusions of his/her mindset, including falsely representing BEAM’s material about Mr. G being associated with the other so called “bigfoots” that have extended life cycles due to experimentation and not of the same planetary origins.

It is time wasted on the ignorance of delusional characters that seem to infest this website, if Markvd is reading this, then it is time for you to do the necessary research and re-track your comments or I will go ahead and make a fool of yourself for doing so, which hopefully will add to your knowledge as well and balance out the negatives for your own good at my expense in time and effort. Because you are too lazy to find the answers yourself and like some immature child, wines for spilled milk that was kicked by your own foot.

That should complete my mission in this matter when the final assessment will be done in the Spiritual section as there are no more reasons to add to this foundation of sorts.

--Hawaiian 20:33, 13 December 2010 (UTC)